Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4417 14
Original file (NR4417 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
mEePpARTMER

{
id
7
“|
T,
Th
2
yp
_
-<

 

nopee yous ) fete Fusmerse ee Bille Sa Baw Bio Wet se ebe Tee

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, pW bud
ARLINGTON, VA P2204-2490

 

HCG

Theale ae KTR. AANTI 1A
ae ee de le eS rE ak tf a

13 January 2015

pear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your

naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

7 January 2015. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with ail material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to

establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

you. enlisted in the- Navy and began a period of active duty on

58 June 1996. On-24 February 1997, you received a voluntary
psychological evaluation due to your difficuity adjusting to the
Navy: The evaluation stated that you disliked dealing with
supervisors and were worried about making the six month cruise and
having to deal with petty officers every day. Psychological .
testing was completed which revealed high anger, rebelliousness,
difficulty with rules and regulations as well as authority
figures, low Frustration tolerance, and poor impulse control.
Testing was supportive of a personality disorder. Based on the
psychological evaluation, your Commanding officer did not ©
recommend you for retention and recommended’ you for separation by
reason of convenience of the government due to personality
Gisorder. Subsequently, on 24 March 1997, you received an
honorabie discharge by reason of personality disorder. At that
time, you were -assigried an RE-4 reenlistment. code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your
desire to change your reason for separation and change your
reenlistment code. Wevertheless, the Board found these factors
were not sufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code or
changing your narrative reason for separation. Your narrative

moaned

yveason tor personality Giscraer is expiained ab a comuilion, Rot
amounting to a disability, which significantly impaired your
ability to function effectively in the military environment and
potentially interfered with assignment of performance of duty. ©
Based on your record, this is an accurate assessment. Finaily, an
RE-4 reenlistment code is proper given your reason for separation
and non-recommendation for retention. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board veconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption
of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.

ROBERT J. O'NEILL

Frecutive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07314-01

    Original file (07314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You enlisted in the Navy on 3 August 1994 for four years at age 18.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07101-00

    Original file (07101-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The diagnosis of Delusional Disorder, Paranoid Type, was thus established at this evaluation. The petitioner's psychological evaluations consistently reported that no delusions were present. However, this does not SUBJ: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN CASE OF mean the condition was also present at the time they were diagnosed solely as Personality Disorder.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01443

    Original file (ND03-01443.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My DD-214 says my reason for discharge is for a personality disorder. The psychiatrist recommended separation based on a personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07362-08

    Original file (07362-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2009. Nevertheless, the Board found i that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given the diagnosis of a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3010 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR3010 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consi your application, together with all material submitted in thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulati and policies After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence sul tted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable erial error or Ln uselce l You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active duty on 28 June 1968. New evidence is evidence not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR646 14

    Original file (NR646 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ~ your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3198-13

    Original file (NR3198-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2014. regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, Regu Lenore and policies. Consequently, when applying for-a correction of an official Naval record,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100267

    Original file (ND1100267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6C (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS), effective 15 December 2005 until PRESENT establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 March 1997.B. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07315-01

    Original file (07315-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Absent such evidence, the Board concluded that the reason for discharge and separation code were appropriate.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07676-01

    Original file (07676-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, you have not submitted any Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged based on a diagnosed personality disorder. The Board believed that your difficulties adapting to the Navy and the adverse performance evaluation were...